Children in Micro-Apartments: Spatial Confinement and the Crisis of Adequate Housing

The ongoing trend of shrinking apartment sizes effectively forces children into conditions of spatial confinement that are incompatible with healthy development. In many countries, two-bedroom units are being reduced to approximately 45 m², and one-bedroom units to around 20 m². 
These reductions are largely driven by profit-oriented development models and are often justified under the discourse of “sustainability” and efficiency. While adults may tolerate smaller living spaces due to spending substantial time outside the home, for children, the dwelling is their primary environment. It is the space where they play, study, rest, socialize, imagine, and grow.
When a child’s living space is reduced to a single small room of 10–15 m², the home risks becoming a space of confinement rather than care. Under such conditions, daily movement is severely restricted, opportunities for play and social interaction are limited, and screen-based activities increasingly replace physical and social experiences. Public playgrounds and shared outdoor spaces cannot compensate for inadequate domestic space; they are complementary to the home, not substitutes for it.
Allowing the systematic reduction of residential space raises serious concerns about children’s rights and well-being. Long-term exposure to overcrowded or undersized living environments is associated with negative psychological, emotional, and developmental outcomes. 
Central authorities and municipalities that permit minimum-size housing standards driven primarily by investor profitability must reconsider these policies through the lens of children’s rights, public health, and long-term social sustainability. Housing policy should define minimum residential standards that reflect the developmental needs of children, not merely market efficiency or financial return.
No alternative text description for this image